Search the catalogue for collection items held by the National Library of Australia. Craver, Carl F. Explaining the brain : mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Carl F. Craver constructs and defends standards for evaluating neuroscientific explanations that are grounded in a systematic view of what neuroscientific explanations are: descriptions of multilevel mechanisms.
In developing this approach, he draws on a wide range of examples in the history of neuroscience e. Hodgkin and Huxley's model of the action potential and LTP as a putative explanation for different kinds of memory , as well as recent philosophical work on the nature of scientific explanation. Readers in neuroscience, psychology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science will find much to provoke and stimulate them in this book. Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card.
To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video.
You can view this on the NLA website. Login Register. Advanced search Search history.
Browse titles authors subjects uniform titles series callnumbers dewey numbers starting from optional. See what's been added to the collection in the current 1 2 3 4 5 6 weeks months years. Your reader barcode: Your last name:. Mechanisms in biology Book 4 editions published in in English and held by 3 WorldCat member libraries worldwide. Explaining the brain : mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience by Carl F Craver 1 edition published in in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide.
Explaining the brain by Carl F Craver Book 1 edition published in in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide. The making of a memory mechanism by Carl F Craver 1 edition published in in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide.
Mechanisms and emergence a reply to Denis C. No evidence of risk-taking or impulsive behaviour in a person with episodic amnesia: Implications for the role of the hippocampus in future-regarding decision-making 1 edition published in in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide Abstract : Does advantageous decision-making require one to explicitly remember the outcome of a series of past decisions or to imagine future personal consequences of one's choices?
Findings that amnesic people with hippocampal damage cannot form a clear preference for advantageous decks over many learning trials on the Iowa Gambling Task IGT have been taken to suggest that complex decision-making on the IGT depends on declarative episodic memory and hippocampal integrity. We tested this possibility in the amnesic individual K. He also did not display impulsive or risk-taking behaviour on the TGT, despite a profound inability to imagine personal future experiences.
These findings suggest that impaired decision-making on the IGT in amnesia is unlikely to reflect a predilection to act in the moment or failure to take future consequences into account.
For example, Weiskopf defends the explanatory autonomy of cognitive models, Egan argues for the autonomy of function-theoretic models, and Aizawa considers examples of multiply realizable and thus partially autonomous kinds in the science of colour vision. Even in these latter cases though, the tone is generally conciliatory—every chapter of this volume makes an effort to move the debate forward rather than simply re-treading old ground, and it is perhaps most valuable for the questions it leaves unanswered, providing invitations for future debate and discussion.
- Library Hub Discover.
- The Story of Aint: America, Its Language, and the Most Controversial Dictionary Ever Published.
- Youth: Choices and Change (PAHO Scientific Publications)?
Several chapters focus on topics relating to mechanistic explanation, which offers a distinctive perspective on autonomy and integration. Shagrir and Bechtel explore the role of phenomena in mechanistic explanation, focusing on quantifiable and contextually specified phenomena.
Mini Book Review: “Explaining the Brain,” by Carl Craver
These four chapters are grouped towards the end of the volume and taken together raise several outstanding issues that the mechanistic explanation framework will be faced with moving forward. I will return to these issues and their associated chapters shortly, but first I will briefly discuss one earlier chapter that makes an especially distinctive contribution and will be of particular interest to a non-specialist audience.
Advocates of integration and autonomy agree on the second question, advocates of integration and elimination agree on the first, and advocates of autonomy and elimination agree on the third. Murphy goes on to consider each question in more detail, and the implications each perspective has for contemporary debates in philosophy of cognitive science including those considered elsewhere in the volume.
The further these new concepts move away from our existing ones, the more integration begins to look like elimination.
Carl F. Craver - Google 학술검색 서지정보
In an otherwise quite technical volume, this chapter is most likely to be of interest to the general reader. As indicated above, mechanistic explanation is a major focus of the volume, especially in the four chapters discussed below. As Kaplan indicates in his introduction, previous attempts to resolve this tension have tended to emphasize a dichotomy between integration or reduction and autonomy, whereas at least some proponents of mechanistic explanation have tried to explore a middle ground between these two extremes.